|
||||||||
|
|
#16 | |
|
Gold Account Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,082
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
This game it needs more work. And if no1 take cares about it, it will stay being a game that is fun for a while but it doesn't really give any sense to strategic games. I've played everyone considered good in this game, i've beat them all many times, and i know i am not near to a decent strategic player, cause i dont have enough patience. AFO, makes the same mistakes everytime, and i see them since 2 years ago. And he won the last finals. Probably kasparov would suck at TAO, because everything is pretty much luck. Everyone using the same set, everyone can learn moves against it, or not. But the fact is TAo has been made in a way that no1 can really have time to think against a rusher with dsm, you can just react. And who kill who faster, is just not a good game. Let's face it, TAO has an initial idea that's good, but Seed did not take care of it cause it did not pay off. And we did pay off.
__________________
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
I suck D
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Peeing on your front door. Tee Hee.
Posts: 2,199
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Haha. You're such a tool Rag.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Doors of Perception...or Maine...
Posts: 323
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
1. Chanty 2. Cleric 3. Scout In order |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Element of Treachery
|
I would have the scout a tad bit higher since you can easily win a game without using the cleric.
__________________
![]() *props to PUZZ* Heavens Knights: Never Give Up, Never Surrender |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
About Us | Advertising | Privacy | TOS | Contact Us | |
Site requirement: Macromedia Flash Player |
| Copyright © 2009 TAO Gaming, Inc | Game and website created by Digital Seed Entertainment |